Theoretical and Conceptual Investigation of the Effect of Pore Water Chemistry on Formation Breakdown Pressure Estimation using Conventional Models in Hydraulic Fracturing Operation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The three main factors affecting formation breakdown pressure (PB) include rock mechanical and petrophysical properties, fluid properties and in-situ stress fields. Boreholes in different reservoir sections within the same rock type and reservoir and even under the same stress fields may exhibit different PB behaviors due to differences in pore water chemistry (different ionic composition and ionic strength) and geochemical interactions between pore water and rock. The PB can be estimated based on different theoretical and empirical models. However, in these models, the geochemical effect is not directly captured. Besides, the accuracy of PB estimation using these relations is still unknown. In this study, the accuracy of PB estimation using the conventional models and the effects of pore water chemistry on PB were investigated using published data from literature. Also, a new model was developed based on the concept of effective stress, disjoining pressure and the superposition principle for stress distribution around well-bore. The results indicate that most of the conventional models are unsuccessful in PB prediction for hydraulic fracturing operations. As an example, the popular Hubert-Willis model has an average error of 34.7%. Our study indicates that pore water chemistry has a substantial effect on rock wettability and PB due to the change of inter-granular forces, based on the DLVO theory, affecting the rock strength. The results of the new conceptual model show a decrease in the PB of chalkstone with an increase in the concentration of the sulfate ions in the pore water.

Keywords

References

[1] Hubbert M. K. & Willis D. G. (1957): Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE 4597 Vol. 20. 6 Oct. L.A.
[2] Sampath, M., Perera, A., Ranjith, G., (2018): Theoretical overview of hydraulic fracturing break-down pressure. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. Vol. 58, P.: 251-265.
[3] Kiss A, Fruhwirth R., Pongratz R., Maerr R. (2018): Formation Breakdown Pressure Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks. SPE paper191391-18IHFT-MS.18 Oct. Muscat.
[4] AlTammar, Sharma M., (2018): Effect of Borehole Pressurization Scheme on Breakdown Pressure. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. Vol. 52, Iss. 8, P.: 2709-2715.
[5] Cheng Y., Zhang Y., Yu Z., Hu Z., (2021): Experimental & Numerical Studies on HF Characteristics With Different Injection Rates in Granite Geothermal. Energy Science & Engineering. Vol. 9, Iss. 1, P.:142-168.
[6] Bergsaker A., Røyne A., Ougier J., F. Renard, (2016): The effect of fluid composition, salinity, and acidity on subcritical crack growth in calcite crystals. J. Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 121, P.: 1631–1651.
[7] Israelachvili J, (2011): Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, New York City.
[8] Gutierrez M, Høeg K., (2000): The Effect of Fluid Content on the Mechanical Behaviour of Fractures in Chalk. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. Vol. 33, Iss. 2, P.: 93–117.
[9] Risnes, R., (2001): Deformation and Yield in High Porosity Outcrop Chalk. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy. Vol. 26, Iss. 1–2, P.: 53-57.
[10] Rostom, F., A. Røyne, D. K. Dysthe, and F. Renard (2013), Effect of fluid salinity on subcritical crack propagation in calcite. Journal of Tectonophysics, Vol. 583, P.: 68-75.
[11] Mahani H., Levy K. A., Berg S., Bartels W., Nasralla R., Rossen W., (2015): Insights into the Mechanism of Wettability Alteration by Low-Salinity Flooding (LSF) in Carbonates. Energy Fuels, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, P.: 1352–1367.
[12] Megawati M., Hiorth A., Madland M. V., (2013): The impact of surface charge on the mechanical behavior of high-porosity chalk. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. Vol. 46, Iss. 5, P.:1073–1090.
[13] Sachdeva J., Nermoen A., Reidar I., Korsnes, Madland V., (2020): Effect of Initial Wettability on Rock Mechanics and Oil Recovery: Comparative Study on Outcrop Chalks. Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 133, P: 85-117.
[14] Strand, S., Høgnesen, E.J., Austad, T., (2006b): Wettability Alteration of Carbonates—Effects of Potential Determining Ions (Ca2+ and SO42-) and Temperature. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Vol. 275, Iss. 1–3, 1, P.: 1-10.
[15] Meireles L., Storebø E., Welch M., Fabricius I., (2021): Water weakening of soft and stiff outcrop chalk induced by electrical double layer disjoining pressure. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 141, ISSN 1365-1609.
[16] Alshakhs M.J., Kovscek A.R., (2015): Understanding the Role of Brine Ionic Comp. on Oil Recovery by Assessment of Wettability from Colloidal Forces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 233, Epub, P.: 126-138.
[17] Zoback M., (2010-2007): Reservoir Geomechanics. ISBN-978-0-521-77069-9. Page 65-69.
Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics
Volume 6, Issue 1
May 2023
Pages 40-51

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics