Permeability Prediction from Log Data using Machine Learning Methods

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه بین الملل امام خمینی

2 دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی

3 ارشد پتروفیزیست، شرکت پارس پترو زاگرس

چکیده

In this paper, models for permeability prediction of oil reservoirs using a machine learning approach and petrophysical data are compared. Various machine learning methods, including multi-resolution graph-based clustering, conventional artificial neural networks and Extreme Learning Machines are employed to have a comprehensive comparison. RCAL data from one of Iran's oil reservoirs was used to develop and test the machine-learning approach. The results of the machine learning models employed in this paper are compared with relevant real petrophysical data and well evaluations. Seven input models of two different wells of this reservoir were considered for permeability estimation. The input logs data of models include Resistivity (RT), Effective Porosity (PHIE), Density log (RHOB), Sonic log (DT) and Compensated neutron porosity log (NPHI) logs data. The correlation coefficient and the root mean square error between the prediction data and core data in the ELM method were obtained as 0.94 and 0.06, respectively. In the MRGC method, the correlation coefficient and the root mean square error between the prediction data and core data were obtained as 0.98 and 0.09, respectively. The obtained results in this paper show that the mentioned models are well able to estimate permeability values in all parts of the studied formation and it can be concluded that the clustering method based on MRGC has more correlation with the core data, and Instead, the ELM method has the least amount of error in permeability prediction. According to the error values, ELM can be recommended as the final selected algorithm for permeability prediction in this study.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Permeability Prediction from Log Data using Machine Learning Methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Davari 1
  • Saeedeh Senemari 1
  • Andisheh Alimoradi 2
  • Seyed Javad Safavi 3
1 Imam Khomeini International University
2 Imam Khomeini International University
3 Senior Petrophysicist at Pars Petro Zagros (PPZ) Company, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this paper, models for permeability prediction of oil reservoirs using a machine learning approach and petrophysical data are compared. Various machine learning methods, including multi-resolution graph-based clustering, conventional artificial neural networks and Extreme Learning Machines are employed to have a comprehensive comparison. RCAL data from one of Iran's oil reservoirs was used to develop and test the machine-learning approach. The results of the machine learning models employed in this paper are compared with relevant real petrophysical data and well evaluations. Seven input models of two different wells of this reservoir were considered for permeability estimation. The input logs data of models include Resistivity (RT), Effective Porosity (PHIE), Density log (RHOB), Sonic log (DT) and Compensated neutron porosity log (NPHI) logs data. The correlation coefficient and the root mean square error between the prediction data and core data in the ELM method were obtained as 0.94 and 0.06, respectively. In the MRGC method, the correlation coefficient and the root mean square error between the prediction data and core data were obtained as 0.98 and 0.09, respectively. The obtained results in this paper show that the mentioned models are well able to estimate permeability values in all parts of the studied formation and it can be concluded that the clustering method based on MRGC has more correlation with the core data, and Instead, the ELM method has the least amount of error in permeability prediction. According to the error values, ELM can be recommended as the final selected algorithm for permeability prediction in this study.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Petrophysical Interpretation
  • Permeability
  • Artificial Intelligence Network
  • Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering
  • Extreme Machine Learning
[1] Alimoradi, A., Hajkarimian, H., Hemati Ahooi, H., and Salsabili, M., (2022), “Comparison between the Performance of Four Metaheuristic Algorithms in Training a Multilayer Perceptron Machine for Gold Grade Estimation,” International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 56, 2, pp. 97–105.
[2] Mohaghegh, S., (2000), “Virtual-Intelligence Applications in Petroleum Engineering: Part 1—Artificial Neural Networks,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 52, 09, pp. 64–73.
[3] Mohaghegh, S. D., (2000), “Virtual Intelligence and Its Applications in Petroleum Engineering; Part 3. Fuzzy Logic, Distinguished Author Series,” Journal of Petroleum Technology (JPT).
[4] Huang, Z., and Williamson, M. A., (1997), “Determination of Porosity and Permeability in Reservoir Intervals by Artificial Neural Network Modelling, Offshore Eastern Canada,” Petroleum Geoscience, 3, 3, pp. 245–258.
[5] Hampson, D. P., Schuelke, J. S., and Quirein, J. A., (2001), “Use of Multiattribute Transforms to Predict Log Properties from Seismic Data,” Geophysics, 66, 1, pp. 220–236.
[6] Russell, B. H., (2004), "The Application of Multivariate Statistics and Neural Networks to the Prediction of Reservoir Parameters Using Seismic Attributes", PhD Thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Calgary, Alberta.
[7] Nooruddin, H. A., Anifowose, F., and Abdulraheem, A., (2013), “Applying Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Develop Permeability Predictive Models Using Mercury Injection Capillary-Pressure Data,” SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, SPE, p. SPE-168109.
[8] Al-Anazi, A. F., and Gates, I. D., (2012), “Support Vector Regression to Predict Porosity and Permeability: Effect of Sample Size,” Comput Geosci, 39, pp. 64–76.
[9] Singh, S., Kanli, A. I., and Sevgen, S., (2016), “A General Approach for Porosity Estimation Using Artificial Neural Network Method: A Case Study from Kansas Gas Field,” Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60, pp. 130–140.
[10] Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., and Siew, C.-K., (2004), “Extreme Learning Machine: A New Learning Scheme of Feedforward Neural Networks,” 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37541), Ieee, pp. 985–990.
[11] Saffarzadeh, S., and Shadizadeh, S. R., (2012), “Reservoir Rock Permeability Prediction Using Support Vector Regression in an Iranian Oil Field,” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 3, pp. 336–344.
[12] Olatunji, S. O., Selamat, A., and Raheem, A. A. A., (2013), “Extreme Learning Machines Based Model for Predicting Permeability of Carbonate Reservoir,” International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7, 1, p. 450.
[13] Xiao, D., Li, B., and Mao, Y., (2017), “A Multiple Hidden Layers Extreme Learning Machine Method and Its Application,” Math Probl Eng, 2017.
[14] Adeniran, A. A., Adebayo, A. R., Salami, H. O., Yahaya, M. O., and Abdulraheem, A., (2019), “A Competitive Ensemble Model for Permeability Prediction in Heterogeneous Oil and Gas Reservoirs,” Applied Computing and Geosciences, 1, p. 100004.
[15] Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Mohaghegh, S., Lin, C., Sun, Y., and Pei, S., (2021), “Pattern Visualization and Understanding of Machine Learning Models for Permeability Prediction in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs,” J Pet Sci Eng, 200, p. 108142.
[16] Sarkheil, H. (2023) “Combining Voronoi Triangulation Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) Models with Fractal Dimension Analysis of Complex Sequences for Predicting Porosity and Permeability”, Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics, 6 (3), pp. 74-81.
[17] Sarkheil, H., Hassani, H., &  Alinia, F., (2021) “Fractured reservoir distribution characterization using folding mechanism analysis and patterns recognition in the Tabnak hydrocarbon reservoir anticline”. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11, 2425–2433.
[18] Rolon, L., Mohaghegh, S. D., Ameri, S., Gaskari, R., and McDaniel, B., (2009), “Using Artificial Neural Networks to Generate Synthetic Well Logs,” J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 1, 4–5, pp. 118–133.
[19] Tofighi, F., Armani, P., Chehrazi, A., and Alimoradi, A., (2021), “Comparison of the Function of Conventional Neural Networks for Estimating Porosity in One of the Southeastern Iranian Oil Fields,” Journal of Petroleum Research, 31, 1400–3, pp. 90–105.
[20] Vemuri, V. R., and Rogers, R. D., (1994), “Artificial Neural Networks: Forecasting Time Series,” Los Alamitos.
[21] Ye, S.-J., and Rabiller, P., (2000), “A New Tool for Electro-Facies Analysis: Multi-Resolution Graph-Based Clustering,” SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA, p. SPWLA-2000.
[22] Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., Mao, K. Z., Siew, C.-K., Saratchandran, P., and Sundararajan, N., (2006), “Can Threshold Networks Be Trained Directly?,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 53, 3, pp. 187–191.
[23] Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., and Siew, C.-K., (2006), “Extreme Learning Machine: Theory and Applications,” Neurocomputing, 70, 1–3, pp. 489–501.
[24] Mantoro, T., Olowolayemo, A., and Olatunji, S. O., (2010), “Mobile User Location Determination Using Extreme Learning Machine,” Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Moslem World (ICT4M) 2010, IEEE, pp. D25–D30.
[25] Fathi, M., Alimoradi, A., and Hemati Ahooi, H. R., (2021), “Optimizing Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm Using Particle Swarm Optimization to Estimate Iron Ore Grade,” Journal of Mining and Environment, 12, 2, pp. 397–411.
[26] Sarkheil, H., Hassani, H., & Alinia, F.,  (2013) “Fractures distribution modeling using fractal and multi-fractal–neural network analysis in Tabnak hydrocarbon field, Fars, Iran.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 945–956.
[27] Jahan mohammadi, H., Mosaddeg, H., Azizzadeh, M., Sarkheil, H., Mohammadnia, M., (2024), “Determination of safe mud weight window and optimal drilling path in the Gadwan formation using rock failure criteria in one of the hydrocarbon fields in southwest Iran”. Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics, 6(4), 61-80.