مدل چند صفحه ای غیر هم محور برای مصالح نا همسانگرد دانه ای و کاربرد عددی آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی-تهران

چکیده

Non-coaxiality plays a key role in modelling of problems with significant stress rotation in soil mechanics. This will be more crucial in types of soils or granular materials with anisotropy. Many of the constituent rocks of oil and gas reservoirs are of the anisotropic type, so considering anisotropy in the study of oil reservoirs will have special significance. Neglecting to account for stress and strain non-coaxiality would result in errors and overestimating soil capacity. A mathematical solution is developed and applied within the framework of multi-laminate model, to deal with this issue. Selecting multi-laminate frame as the base of the model facilitates consideration of anisotropy with less mathematical effort. In addition, tracing fabric evolution may be much easier in this framework. Concept of stress and strain vector fields are introduced for shear components of planes, and in contrast to ancestor multi-laminate models, shear stress is calculated through this concept for each plane in the proposed model. Using this method, non-coaxiality may be considered on planes, and consequently the integrated result of plane stresses will be non-coaxial as well. Finally, to apply the model for greater problems, a code is developed to introduce the new model to FE program, Opensees. The program is implemented for analyzing an experimental plane-strain loading test of an anisotropic dense specimen of Toyoura sand. The results show a good agreement between theory and experiment.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Non-Coaxial Multi-laminate model for anisotropic granular material and its numerical implementation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahrooz Shakeri Garakani
  • Hasan Ghasemzadeh
KNT University of technology
چکیده [English]

Non-coaxiality plays a key role in modelling of problems with significant stress rotation in soil mechanics. This will be more crucial in types of soils or granular materials with anisotropy. Many of the constituent rocks of oil and gas reservoirs are of the anisotropic type, so considering anisotropy in the study of oil reservoirs will have special significance. Neglecting to account for stress and strain non-coaxiality would result in errors and overestimating soil capacity. A mathematical solution is developed and applied within the framework of multi-laminate model, to deal with this issue. Selecting multi-laminate frame as the base of the model facilitates consideration of anisotropy with less mathematical effort. In addition, tracing fabric evolution may be much easier in this framework. Concept of stress and strain vector fields are introduced for shear components of planes, and in contrast to ancestor multi-laminate models, shear stress is calculated through this concept for each plane in the proposed model. Using this method, non-coaxiality may be considered on planes, and consequently the integrated result of plane stresses will be non-coaxial as well. Finally, to apply the model for greater problems, a code is developed to introduce the new model to FE program, Opensees. The program is implemented for analyzing an experimental plane-strain loading test of an anisotropic dense specimen of Toyoura sand. The results show a good agreement between theory and experiment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Fabric Assessment"
  • "Damage"
  • "Anisotropy"
  • "Geo-Materials"
  • "Multi-Laminate"
  • "Stress Rotation"

مراجع

[1] Ghasemzade H. and SanayePasand M. “Thermo-Hydrodynamic modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs” Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics, 2019 Jun., pp. 60-80. (In Persian)
[2] Miura, K., Miura, S. and Toki, S., (1986), "Deformation behavior of anisotropic dense sand under principal stress axes rotation" Soils and Foundations, (1986) Vol.26-1, pp. 36-52.
[3] Yang Y, Yu HS. Application of a non-coaxial soil model in shallow foundations. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal. 2006 Aug 31;1(2):139-50.
[4] Gräbe PJ, Clayton CR. Effects of principal stress rotation on permanent deformation in rail track foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2009 Apr;135(4):555-65.
[5] Yang L. Experimental study of soil anisotropy using hollow cylinder testing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
[6] Bažant ZP. Comment on orthotropic models for concrete and geomaterials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1983 Jun;109(3):849-65.
[7] Bažant, Z. and Oh, B. (1985). "Microplane Model for Progressive Fracture of Concrete and Rock" J. Eng. Mech., (1985) Vol. 111-4, pp. 559-582.
[8] Borja RI, Sama KM, Sanz PF. On the numerical integration of three-invariant elastoplastic constitutive models. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering. 2003 Feb 28;192(9-10):1227-58.
[9] Li, X. and Dafalias, Y. (2002). "Constitutive Modeling of Inherently Anisotropic Sand Behavior" J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., (2002), Vol. 128-10, pp. 868-880.
[10] Gao ZW, Zhao JD, Yao YP. (2010). "A generalized anisotropic failure criterion for geomaterials" Int J Solids Struct, (2010), Vol. 47-(22-23), pp. 3166–3185.
[11] Cai Y, Yu HS, Wanatowski D, Li X. Noncoaxial behavior of sand under various stress paths. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2012 Oct 10;139(8):1381-95.
[12] Tong ZX, Zhang JM, Yu YL, Zhang G. Drained deformation behavior of anisotropic sands during cyclic rotation of principal stress axes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2010 Apr 30;136(11):1509-18.
[13] ISHIHARA K, Towhata I. Sand response to cyclic rotation of principal stress directions as induced by wave loads. Soils and foundations. 1983 Dec 15;23(4):11-26.
[14] Nakata Y, Hyodo M, Murata H, Yasufuku N. Flow deformation of sands subjected to principal stress rotation. Soils and Foundations. 1998 Jun 15;38(2):115-28.
[15] Zhou J, Yan J, Xu C, Gong X. Influence of intermediate principal stress on undrained behavior of intact clay under pure principal stress rotation. Math Probl Eng 2013;25(2013):1–10.
[16] Zhou J, Yan JJ, Liu ZY, Gong XN. Undrained anisotropy and non-coaxial behavior of clayey soil under principal stress rotation. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A. 2014 Apr 1;15(4):241-54.
[17] Yan JJ, Zhou J, Gong XN, Cao Y. Undrained response of reconstituted clay to cyclic pure principal stress rotation. Journal of Central South University. 2015 Jan 1;22(1):280-9.
[18] Bažant P, Oh BH. Efficient numerical integration on the surface of a sphere. ZAMM Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik. 1986 Jan 1;66(1):37-49.
[19] Christoffersen J, Mehrabadi MM, Nemat-Nasser S. A micromechanical description of granular material behavior. Journal of applied mechanics. 1981 Jun 1;48(2):339-44.
[20] Oda M, Konishi J, Nemat-Nasser S. Some experimentally based fundamental results on the mechanical behaviour of granular materials. Geotechnique. 1980 Dec;30(4):479-95.
[21] Taheri E, Sadrnejad SA. Prediction of internal mechanism of soil upon multiplane framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics. Tehran, Iran; 2010: Paper No. & Code: 029.
[22] Ghadrdan M, Sadrnejad SA, Shaghaghi T. Numerical evaluation of geomaterials behavior upon multiplane damage model. Computers and Geotechnics. 2015 Jul 1;68:1-7.
[23] Sadrnejad SA, Shakeri S. Multi-laminate non-coaxial modelling of anisotropic sand behavior through damage formulation. Computers and Geotechnics. 2017 Aug 1;88:18-31.
[24] Bažant ZP, Caner FC, Carol I, Adley MD, Akers SA. Microplane model M4 for concrete. I: Formulation with work-conjugate deviatoric stress. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2000 Sep;126(9):944-53.
[25] Carol I, Bažant ZP. Damage and plasticity in micro-plane theory. Int J Solids Struct.. 1997;34(29):3807–3835.
[26] Schädlich B, Schweiger HF. Anisotropic small strain stiffness within the multilaminate framework. In7th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering 2010 May 25. Balkema.
[27] Choo J, Jung YH, Cho W, Chung CK. Effect of pre-shear stress path on nonlinear shear stiffness degradation of cohesive soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 2013 Jan 24;36(2):198-205.
[28] Likitlersuang S, Teachavorasinskun S, Surarak C, Oh E, Balasubramaniam A. Small strain stiffness and stiffness degradation curve of Bangkok clays. Soils and Foundations. 2013 Aug 1;53(4):498-509.
[29] Carol I, Bažant ZP, Prat PC. Geometric damage tensor based on microplane model. Journal of engineering mechanics. 1991 Oct;117(10):2429-48.
[30] Sadrnejad SA, Shakeri S. Fabric assessment of damaged anisotropic geo-materials using the multi-laminate model. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2017 Jan 1;91:90-103.
[31] Kutter BL, Chen YR, Shen CK. Triaxial and Torsional Shear Test Result for Sand, California USA: Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of California at Davis; 1994.
[32] Tong ZX, Zhang JM, Yu YL, Zhang G. Drained deformation behavior of anisotropic sands during cyclic rotation of principal stress axes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2010 Apr 30;136(11):1509-18.
[33] Oda M, Konishi J, Nemat-Nasser S. Experimental micromechanical evaluation of strength of granular materials: effects of particle rolling. Mechanics of materials. 1982 Dec 1;1(4):269-83.
[34] Oda M, Nemat-Nasser S, Konishi J. Stress-induced anisotropy in granular masses. Soils and foundations. 1985 Sep 15;25(3):85-97.
[35] OPENSEES Team (2012, Feb 16). Adding your own code. Retrieved 2018, Apr. 15, from http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Adding_your_own_Code
[36] Oda M, Kazama H. Microstructure of shear bands and its relation to the mechanisms of dilatancy and failure of dense granular soils. Geotechnique. 1998 Aug;48(4):465-81.
 
نشریه علمی ژئومکانیک نفت
دوره 6، شماره 3
شماره ویژه انگلیسی
آبان 1402
صفحه 21-42

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار